Habitat monitoring in Europe is regulated by Article 17 of the Habitats Directive, which suggests the use of typical species to assess habitat conservation status. Yet, the Directive uses the term “typical” species but does not provide a definition, either for its use in reporting or for its use in impact assessments. To address the issue, an online workshop was organized by the Italian Society for Vegetation Science (SISV) to shed light on the diversity of perspectives regarding the different concepts of typical species, and to discuss the possible im-plications for habitat monitoring. To this aim, we inquired 73 people with a very different degree of expertise in the field of vegetation science by means of a tailored survey composed of six questions. We analysed the data using Pearson's Chi-squared test to verify that the answers diverged from a random distribution and checked the effect of the degree of experience of the surveyees on the results. We found that most of the surveyees agreed on the use of the phytosociological method for habitat monitoring and of the diagnostic and characteristic species to evaluate the structural and functional conservation status of habitats. With this contribution, we shed light on the meaning of “typical” species in the context of habitat monitoring.
Shedding light on typical species: Implications for habitat monitoring / Bonari, G.; Fantinato, E.; Lazzaro, L.; Sperandii, M. G.; Acosta, A. T. R.; Allegrezza, M.; Assini, S.; Caccianiga, M.; Di Cecco, V.; Frattaroli, A.; Gigante, D.; Rivieccio, G.; Tesei, G.; Valle, B.; Viciani, D.; Rocchetti, G. A.; Angiolini, C.; Badalamenti, E.; Barberis, D.; Barcella, M.; Bazan, G.; Bertacchi, A.; Bolpagni, R.; Bonini, F.; Bricca, A.; Buffa, G.; Calbi, M.; Cannucci, S.; Pinna, L. C.; Caria, M. C.; Carli, E.; Cascone, S.; Casti, M.; Cerabolini, B. E. L.; Copiz, R.; Cutini, M.; de Simone, L.; de Toma, A.; Fratte, M. D.; Di Martino, L.; Di Pietro, R.; Filesi, L.; Foggi, B.; Fortini, P.; Gennaio, R.; Gheza, G.; Lonati, M.; Mainetti, A.; Malavasi, M.; Marceno, C.; Micheli, C.; Minuzzo, C.; Mugnai, M.; Musarella, C. M.; Napoleone, F.; Nota, G.; Piga, G.; Pittarello, M.; Pozzi, I.; Praleskouskaya, S.; Rota, F.; Santini, G.; Sarmati, S.; Selvaggi, A.; Spampinato, G.; Stinca, A.; Tozzi, F. P.; Venanzoni, R.; Villani, M.; Zanatta, K.; Zanzottera, M.; Bagella, S.. - In: PLANT SOCIOLOGY. - ISSN 2280-1855. - 58:1(2021), pp. 157-166. [10.3897/pls2020581/08]
Shedding light on typical species: Implications for habitat monitoring
Fantinato E.;Rivieccio G.;Buffa G.;Caria M. C.;Malavasi M.;Bagella S.
2021-01-01
Abstract
Habitat monitoring in Europe is regulated by Article 17 of the Habitats Directive, which suggests the use of typical species to assess habitat conservation status. Yet, the Directive uses the term “typical” species but does not provide a definition, either for its use in reporting or for its use in impact assessments. To address the issue, an online workshop was organized by the Italian Society for Vegetation Science (SISV) to shed light on the diversity of perspectives regarding the different concepts of typical species, and to discuss the possible im-plications for habitat monitoring. To this aim, we inquired 73 people with a very different degree of expertise in the field of vegetation science by means of a tailored survey composed of six questions. We analysed the data using Pearson's Chi-squared test to verify that the answers diverged from a random distribution and checked the effect of the degree of experience of the surveyees on the results. We found that most of the surveyees agreed on the use of the phytosociological method for habitat monitoring and of the diagnostic and characteristic species to evaluate the structural and functional conservation status of habitats. With this contribution, we shed light on the meaning of “typical” species in the context of habitat monitoring.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
