Background and Aims: Olive cultivars and their wild relatives (oleasters) represent two botanical varieties of Olea europaea subsp. europaea (respectively europaea and sylvestris). Olive cultivars have undergone human selection and their area of diffusion overlaps that of oleasters. Populations of genuine wild olives seem restricted to isolated areas of Mediterranean forests, while most other wild-looking forms of olive may include feral forms that escaped cultivation. Methods: The genetic structure of wild and cultivated olive tree populations was evaluated by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers at a microscale level in one continental and two insular Italian regions. Key Results: The observed patterns of genetic variation were able to distinguish wild from cultivated populations and continental from insular regions. Island oleasters were highly similar to each other and were clearly distinguishable from those of continental regions. Ancient cultivated material from one island clustered with the wild plants, while the old plants from the continental region clustered with the cultivated group. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, we can assume that olive trees have undergone a different selection/domestication process in the insular and mainland regions. The degree of differentiation between oleasters and cultivated trees on the islands suggests that all cultivars have been introduced into these regions from the outside, while the Umbrian cultivars have originated either by selection from local oleasters or by direct introduction from other regions. © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved.

Genetic structure of wild and cultivated olives in the Central Mediterranean basin / Baldoni, L; Tosti, N; Ricciolini, C; Belaj, A; Arcioni, S; Pannelli, G; GERMANA' M., A; Mulas, M; Porceddu, A. - In: ANNALS OF BOTANY. - ISSN 0305-7364. - 98:5(2006), pp. 935-942. [10.1093/aob/mcl178]

Genetic structure of wild and cultivated olives in the Central Mediterranean basin

MULAS M
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
PORCEDDU A
Membro del Collaboration Group
2006

Abstract

Background and Aims: Olive cultivars and their wild relatives (oleasters) represent two botanical varieties of Olea europaea subsp. europaea (respectively europaea and sylvestris). Olive cultivars have undergone human selection and their area of diffusion overlaps that of oleasters. Populations of genuine wild olives seem restricted to isolated areas of Mediterranean forests, while most other wild-looking forms of olive may include feral forms that escaped cultivation. Methods: The genetic structure of wild and cultivated olive tree populations was evaluated by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers at a microscale level in one continental and two insular Italian regions. Key Results: The observed patterns of genetic variation were able to distinguish wild from cultivated populations and continental from insular regions. Island oleasters were highly similar to each other and were clearly distinguishable from those of continental regions. Ancient cultivated material from one island clustered with the wild plants, while the old plants from the continental region clustered with the cultivated group. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, we can assume that olive trees have undergone a different selection/domestication process in the insular and mainland regions. The degree of differentiation between oleasters and cultivated trees on the islands suggests that all cultivars have been introduced into these regions from the outside, while the Umbrian cultivars have originated either by selection from local oleasters or by direct introduction from other regions. © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved.
Genetic structure of wild and cultivated olives in the Central Mediterranean basin / Baldoni, L; Tosti, N; Ricciolini, C; Belaj, A; Arcioni, S; Pannelli, G; GERMANA' M., A; Mulas, M; Porceddu, A. - In: ANNALS OF BOTANY. - ISSN 0305-7364. - 98:5(2006), pp. 935-942. [10.1093/aob/mcl178]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11388/80164
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 149
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 157
social impact