Roelofs, Piai, and Schriefers (Language and Cognitive Processes) test both the WEAVER++ model of word production and the response-exclusion account of performance in Stroop-like tasks against data from the word–word interference (WWI) task, and conclude that whereas the WEAVER++ successfully accounts for those data, the response-exclusion hypothesis fails. Here we show that once recent data from the WWI task are considered, both models fail.
Semantic effects in the word-word interference task: a comment on Roelofs, Piai, and Schriefers (2013) / Treccani, B., Mulatti, C.. - In: LANGUAGE, COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE. - ISSN 2327-3798. - 30:6(2015), pp. 700-703. [10.1080/23273798.2014.1002797]
Semantic effects in the word-word interference task: a comment on Roelofs, Piai, and Schriefers (2013)
TRECCANI, Barbara;
2015-01-01
Abstract
Roelofs, Piai, and Schriefers (Language and Cognitive Processes) test both the WEAVER++ model of word production and the response-exclusion account of performance in Stroop-like tasks against data from the word–word interference (WWI) task, and conclude that whereas the WEAVER++ successfully accounts for those data, the response-exclusion hypothesis fails. Here we show that once recent data from the WWI task are considered, both models fail.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
