Novel riminophenazine derivatives, characterized by the presence of the basic and cumbersome quinolizidinylalkyl and pyrrolizidinylethyl moieties, have been synthesized and tested (Rema test) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and H37Ra, and six clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Most compounds exhibited potent activity against the tested strains, resulting more active than clofazimine, isoniazid and ethambutol. The best compounds (4, 5, 12 and 13) exhibited a MIC in the range 0.82-0.86 μM against all strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and, with the exception of 4 a MIC around 3.3 μM versus M. avium. The corresponding values for clofazimine (CFM) were 1.06 and 4.23 μM, respectively. Cytotoxicity was evaluated against three cell lines and compound 4 displayed a selectivity index (SI) versus the human cell line MT-4 comparable with that of CFM (SI = 5.23 vs 6.4). Toxicity against mammalian Vero 76 cell line was quite lower with SI = 79.
Antitubercular activity of quinolizidinyl/pyrrolizidinylalkyliminophenazines / Tonelli, M; Novelli, F; Tasso, B; Sparatore, A; Boido, V; Sparatore, F; Cannas, S; Molicotti, Paola; Zanetti, Stefania Anna Lucia; Parapini, S; Loddo, R.. - In: BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 0968-0896. - (2014).
Antitubercular activity of quinolizidinyl/pyrrolizidinylalkyliminophenazines.
MOLICOTTI, Paola;ZANETTI, Stefania Anna Lucia;
2014-01-01
Abstract
Novel riminophenazine derivatives, characterized by the presence of the basic and cumbersome quinolizidinylalkyl and pyrrolizidinylethyl moieties, have been synthesized and tested (Rema test) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and H37Ra, and six clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Most compounds exhibited potent activity against the tested strains, resulting more active than clofazimine, isoniazid and ethambutol. The best compounds (4, 5, 12 and 13) exhibited a MIC in the range 0.82-0.86 μM against all strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and, with the exception of 4 a MIC around 3.3 μM versus M. avium. The corresponding values for clofazimine (CFM) were 1.06 and 4.23 μM, respectively. Cytotoxicity was evaluated against three cell lines and compound 4 displayed a selectivity index (SI) versus the human cell line MT-4 comparable with that of CFM (SI = 5.23 vs 6.4). Toxicity against mammalian Vero 76 cell line was quite lower with SI = 79.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
