The validity of price clauses in building savings contracts is disputed not only before German but also Italian courts. With regard to the acquisition fee, the two jurisdictions reach different conclusions based on regulations of general contract terms and conditions, which are largely harmonized by EU consumer law. This paper compares the approaches to acquisition fees in both jurisdictions and evaluates the discrepancies against the background of EU law.

Unharmonious harmonization? Different Approaches to Acquisition Fees in Building Savings Contracts by Italian and German Courts / Chironi, Federica; Bensol, Tahsin. - In: ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EUROPAISCHES PRIVATRECHT. - ISSN 0943-3929. - 2(2025), pp. 347-369.

Unharmonious harmonization? Different Approaches to Acquisition Fees in Building Savings Contracts by Italian and German Courts

Federica Chironi;
2025-01-01

Abstract

The validity of price clauses in building savings contracts is disputed not only before German but also Italian courts. With regard to the acquisition fee, the two jurisdictions reach different conclusions based on regulations of general contract terms and conditions, which are largely harmonized by EU consumer law. This paper compares the approaches to acquisition fees in both jurisdictions and evaluates the discrepancies against the background of EU law.
2025
Unharmonious harmonization? Different Approaches to Acquisition Fees in Building Savings Contracts by Italian and German Courts / Chironi, Federica; Bensol, Tahsin. - In: ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EUROPAISCHES PRIVATRECHT. - ISSN 0943-3929. - 2(2025), pp. 347-369.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/371069
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact