: PurposeTo compare the effectiveness of 3 × 3 mm versus 6 × 6 mm swept source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) scan patterns in detecting and characterizing pachychoroid-associated macular neovascularization (MNV).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 79 eyes from 79 treatment-naïve patients with pachychoroid-associated MNV using SS-OCTA. Both 3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm scans were obtained on the same day. Two masked graders independently evaluated neovascular network area and presence of anastomoses.ResultsMean lesion areas were significantly larger in 6 × 6 mm scans compared to 3 × 3 mm scans (0.869 ± 0.868 mm² vs 0.699 ± 0.697 mm²; p = 0.005). However, analysis of anastomoses revealed superior detection with 3 × 3 mm scans, with 12 eyes (15.2%) showing anastomoses only in 3 × 3 mm scans compared to 4 eyes (5.1%) visible only in 6 × 6 mm scans (p = 0.021). Interobserver agreement was excellent for area measurements (ICC = 0.92).ConclusionsWhile 6 × 6 mm SS-OCTA scans demonstrate larger overall neovascular area measurements, the 3 × 3 mm scan pattern provides superior visualization of anastomoses and fine vascular details in pachychoroid-associated MNV. These findings suggest that 3 × 3 mm scans should be considered the preferred protocol for detailed evaluation of these lesions.

Optimizing resolution for type 1 macular neovascularization detection in pachychoroid disease: A 3 × 3 vs 6 × 6 mm SS-OCTA comparative study / Pignataro, Maria Grazia; Termite, Alba Chiara; Vallino, Veronica; Boscia, Giacomo; Ribezzi, Giulia; Clemente, Arcangelo; Borrelli, Enrico; Parisi, Guglielmo; Olivieri, Chiara; Reibaldi, Michele; Alessio, Giovanni; Dore, Stefano; Boscia, Francesco; Viggiano, Pasquale. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY. - ISSN 1120-6721. - (2025). [10.1177/11206721251382019]

Optimizing resolution for type 1 macular neovascularization detection in pachychoroid disease: A 3 × 3 vs 6 × 6 mm SS-OCTA comparative study

Boscia, Giacomo;Dore, Stefano;Boscia, Francesco;
2025-01-01

Abstract

: PurposeTo compare the effectiveness of 3 × 3 mm versus 6 × 6 mm swept source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) scan patterns in detecting and characterizing pachychoroid-associated macular neovascularization (MNV).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 79 eyes from 79 treatment-naïve patients with pachychoroid-associated MNV using SS-OCTA. Both 3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm scans were obtained on the same day. Two masked graders independently evaluated neovascular network area and presence of anastomoses.ResultsMean lesion areas were significantly larger in 6 × 6 mm scans compared to 3 × 3 mm scans (0.869 ± 0.868 mm² vs 0.699 ± 0.697 mm²; p = 0.005). However, analysis of anastomoses revealed superior detection with 3 × 3 mm scans, with 12 eyes (15.2%) showing anastomoses only in 3 × 3 mm scans compared to 4 eyes (5.1%) visible only in 6 × 6 mm scans (p = 0.021). Interobserver agreement was excellent for area measurements (ICC = 0.92).ConclusionsWhile 6 × 6 mm SS-OCTA scans demonstrate larger overall neovascular area measurements, the 3 × 3 mm scan pattern provides superior visualization of anastomoses and fine vascular details in pachychoroid-associated MNV. These findings suggest that 3 × 3 mm scans should be considered the preferred protocol for detailed evaluation of these lesions.
2025
Optimizing resolution for type 1 macular neovascularization detection in pachychoroid disease: A 3 × 3 vs 6 × 6 mm SS-OCTA comparative study / Pignataro, Maria Grazia; Termite, Alba Chiara; Vallino, Veronica; Boscia, Giacomo; Ribezzi, Giulia; Clemente, Arcangelo; Borrelli, Enrico; Parisi, Guglielmo; Olivieri, Chiara; Reibaldi, Michele; Alessio, Giovanni; Dore, Stefano; Boscia, Francesco; Viggiano, Pasquale. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY. - ISSN 1120-6721. - (2025). [10.1177/11206721251382019]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/370270
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact