We show the error in water-limited yields simulated by crop models which is associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate input data. Crop simulations at large scales (regional, national, continental) frequently use input data of low resolution. Therefore, climate and soil data are often generated via averaging and sampling by area majority. This may bias simulated yields at large scales, varying largely across models. Thus, we evaluated the error associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate data for 14 crop models. Yields of winter wheat and silage maize were simulated under water-limited production conditions. We calculated this error from crop yields simulated at spatial resolutions from 1 to 100 km for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Most models showed yields biased by <15% when aggregating only soil data. The relative mean absolute error (rMAE) of most models using aggregated soil data was in the range or larger than the inter-annual or inter-model variability in yields. This error increased further when both climate and soil data were aggregated. Distinct error patterns indicate that the rMAE may be estimated from few soil variables. Illustrating the range of these aggregation effects across models, this study is a first step towards an ex-ante assessment of aggregation errors in large-scale simulations.

We show the error in water-limited yields simulated by crop models which is associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate input data. Crop simulations at large scales (regional, national, continental) frequently use input data of low resolution. Therefore, climate and soil data are often generated via averaging and sampling by area majority. This may bias simulated yields at large scales, varying largely across models. Thus, we evaluated the error associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate data for 14 crop models. Yields of winter wheat and silage maize were simulated under water-limited production conditions. We calculated this error from crop yields simulated at spatial resolutions from 1 to 100 km for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Most models showed yields biased by <15% when aggregating only soil data. The relative mean absolute error (rMAE) of most models using aggregated soil data was in the range or larger than the inter-annual or inter-model variability in yields. This error increased further when both climate and soil data were aggregated. Distinct error patterns indicate that the rMAE may be estimated from few soil variables. Illustrating the range of these aggregation effects across models, this study is a first step towards an ex-ante assessment of aggregation errors in large-scale simulations.

Impact of spatial soil and climate input data aggregation on regional yield simulations / Roggero, Pier Paolo; Zhao, Gang; Asseng, Senthold; Biernath, Christian; Constantin, Julie; Dechow, René; Doro, Luca; Eckersten, Henrik; Grosz, Balázs; Heinlein, Florian; Kersebaum, Kurt Christian; Kuhnert, Matthias; Moriondo, Marco; Priesack, Eckart; Raynal, Hélène; Siebert, Stefan; Specka, Xenia; Tao, Fulu; Trombi, Giacomo; Wallach, Daniel; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh; Ewert, Frank; Hoffmann, Holger; Bindi, Marco; Coucheney, Elsa; Gaiser, Thomas; Kassie, Belay T.; Klein, Christian; Nendel, Claas; Rötter, Reimund Paul; Teixeira, Edmar; Weihermuller, Lutz; Lewan, Elisabet. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 11:4(2016). [10.1371/journal.pone.0151782]

Impact of spatial soil and climate input data aggregation on regional yield simulations

Roggero, Pier Paolo;Doro, Luca;
2016-01-01

Abstract

We show the error in water-limited yields simulated by crop models which is associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate input data. Crop simulations at large scales (regional, national, continental) frequently use input data of low resolution. Therefore, climate and soil data are often generated via averaging and sampling by area majority. This may bias simulated yields at large scales, varying largely across models. Thus, we evaluated the error associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate data for 14 crop models. Yields of winter wheat and silage maize were simulated under water-limited production conditions. We calculated this error from crop yields simulated at spatial resolutions from 1 to 100 km for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Most models showed yields biased by <15% when aggregating only soil data. The relative mean absolute error (rMAE) of most models using aggregated soil data was in the range or larger than the inter-annual or inter-model variability in yields. This error increased further when both climate and soil data were aggregated. Distinct error patterns indicate that the rMAE may be estimated from few soil variables. Illustrating the range of these aggregation effects across models, this study is a first step towards an ex-ante assessment of aggregation errors in large-scale simulations.
2016
We show the error in water-limited yields simulated by crop models which is associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate input data. Crop simulations at large scales (regional, national, continental) frequently use input data of low resolution. Therefore, climate and soil data are often generated via averaging and sampling by area majority. This may bias simulated yields at large scales, varying largely across models. Thus, we evaluated the error associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate data for 14 crop models. Yields of winter wheat and silage maize were simulated under water-limited production conditions. We calculated this error from crop yields simulated at spatial resolutions from 1 to 100 km for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Most models showed yields biased by &lt;15% when aggregating only soil data. The relative mean absolute error (rMAE) of most models using aggregated soil data was in the range or larger than the inter-annual or inter-model variability in yields. This error increased further when both climate and soil data were aggregated. Distinct error patterns indicate that the rMAE may be estimated from few soil variables. Illustrating the range of these aggregation effects across models, this study is a first step towards an ex-ante assessment of aggregation errors in large-scale simulations.
Impact of spatial soil and climate input data aggregation on regional yield simulations / Roggero, Pier Paolo; Zhao, Gang; Asseng, Senthold; Biernath, Christian; Constantin, Julie; Dechow, René; Doro, Luca; Eckersten, Henrik; Grosz, Balázs; Heinlein, Florian; Kersebaum, Kurt Christian; Kuhnert, Matthias; Moriondo, Marco; Priesack, Eckart; Raynal, Hélène; Siebert, Stefan; Specka, Xenia; Tao, Fulu; Trombi, Giacomo; Wallach, Daniel; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh; Ewert, Frank; Hoffmann, Holger; Bindi, Marco; Coucheney, Elsa; Gaiser, Thomas; Kassie, Belay T.; Klein, Christian; Nendel, Claas; Rötter, Reimund Paul; Teixeira, Edmar; Weihermuller, Lutz; Lewan, Elisabet. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 11:4(2016). [10.1371/journal.pone.0151782]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Hoffmann_H_Impact_of_spatial_soil.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione finale pubblicata)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.13 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
2016 Hoffman et al POne_0151782_s001 (1).PDF

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Tavole
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 456.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
456.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/263018
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 81
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 78
social impact