This paper compares the provision on choice of jurisdiction in Montreal Convention of 1999 on international air transport and those of the previous Warsaw Convention of 1929. The Montreal Convention added the so-called fifth jurisdiction. Issues relating to forum shopping and forum non conveniens are also examined. In particular, the author highlights the non-applicability of the doctrine of forum non conveniens with reference to jurisdictions provided by the uniform law. The author believes that provisions on choise of jurisdiction by Warsaw and Montreal Conventions  does not cover internal distribution of jurisdiction within the States.

This paper compares the provision on choice of jurisdiction in Montreal Convention of 1999 on international air transport and those of the previous Warsaw Convention of 1929. The Montreal Convention added the so-called fifth jurisdiction. Issues relating to forum shopping and forum non conveniens are also examined. In particular, the author highlights the non-applicability of the doctrine of forum non conveniens with reference to jurisdictions provided by the uniform

Problemi di giurisdizione nella convenzione di Montreal del 1999 / Comenale Pinto, Michele Maria. - In: DIRITTO@STORIA. - ISSN 1825-0300. - 14:14(2016).

Problemi di giurisdizione nella convenzione di Montreal del 1999

Comenale Pinto, Michele Maria
2016-01-01

Abstract

This paper compares the provision on choice of jurisdiction in Montreal Convention of 1999 on international air transport and those of the previous Warsaw Convention of 1929. The Montreal Convention added the so-called fifth jurisdiction. Issues relating to forum shopping and forum non conveniens are also examined. In particular, the author highlights the non-applicability of the doctrine of forum non conveniens with reference to jurisdictions provided by the uniform
2016
This paper compares the provision on choice of jurisdiction in Montreal Convention of 1999 on international air transport and those of the previous Warsaw Convention of 1929. The Montreal Convention added the so-called fifth jurisdiction. Issues relating to forum shopping and forum non conveniens are also examined. In particular, the author highlights the non-applicability of the doctrine of forum non conveniens with reference to jurisdictions provided by the uniform law. The author believes that provisions on choise of jurisdiction by Warsaw and Montreal Conventions  does not cover internal distribution of jurisdiction within the States.
Problemi di giurisdizione nella convenzione di Montreal del 1999 / Comenale Pinto, Michele Maria. - In: DIRITTO@STORIA. - ISSN 1825-0300. - 14:14(2016).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ComenalePinto_M_Problemi_di_giurisdizione_nella.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione finale pubblicata)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 1.89 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.89 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/262598
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact