Understanding globalisation appears to be the main motive for studying twentieth-century international history today. Though, there is no shared opinion among scholars until now about how any facts we know may fit such a viewpoint. And that requires some theoretical work in the first place. Of course, the current meaning of globalisation is not very far from everyday life: it might sound rather trivial, as well. But that is no reason to create any unnecessary sophistications while stating it. To most people, globalisation simply means that governments throughout the world either do not want or simply cannot effectively tell private business people what to do and what not to do about their money - as far as any of the latter do control any money in abundance. And that is right. Moreover, governments in a globalised world either do not want or simply cannot effectively tell that even to people from abroad who come to make business in their country. In a globalised world, governments are no players in the game about who gets how many life chances and who loses how many - or stays with how few. Neither taxes nor government spending or currency control are meant to influence results in that field. On these assumptions, one might ask whether enlarged electoral franchise and free ballot would ever be easily matched with such behaviours on the part of governments. Indeed, that sounds like a crucial question - especially to historians. We shall get busy about it.

On globalisation and twentieth-century history: some inquiries about a comparative approach / D'Agata, Raffaele. - In: ANNALI DELLA FACOLTA' DI LINGUE E LETTERATURE STRANIERE DELL'UNIVERSITA' DI SASSARI. - ISSN 1828-5384. - 4:2004 pubbl. 2007(2007), pp. 193-216.

On globalisation and twentieth-century history: some inquiries about a comparative approach

D'Agata, Raffaele
2007

Abstract

Understanding globalisation appears to be the main motive for studying twentieth-century international history today. Though, there is no shared opinion among scholars until now about how any facts we know may fit such a viewpoint. And that requires some theoretical work in the first place. Of course, the current meaning of globalisation is not very far from everyday life: it might sound rather trivial, as well. But that is no reason to create any unnecessary sophistications while stating it. To most people, globalisation simply means that governments throughout the world either do not want or simply cannot effectively tell private business people what to do and what not to do about their money - as far as any of the latter do control any money in abundance. And that is right. Moreover, governments in a globalised world either do not want or simply cannot effectively tell that even to people from abroad who come to make business in their country. In a globalised world, governments are no players in the game about who gets how many life chances and who loses how many - or stays with how few. Neither taxes nor government spending or currency control are meant to influence results in that field. On these assumptions, one might ask whether enlarged electoral franchise and free ballot would ever be easily matched with such behaviours on the part of governments. Indeed, that sounds like a crucial question - especially to historians. We shall get busy about it.
On globalisation and twentieth-century history: some inquiries about a comparative approach / D'Agata, Raffaele. - In: ANNALI DELLA FACOLTA' DI LINGUE E LETTERATURE STRANIERE DELL'UNIVERSITA' DI SASSARI. - ISSN 1828-5384. - 4:2004 pubbl. 2007(2007), pp. 193-216.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
D'Agata_R_Articolo_2007_Globalisation.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione finale pubblicata)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 82.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
82.36 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/262499
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact