A study was carried out to assess the efficacy and the economic profit of prophylactic treatment against Isopsora suis with toltrazuril or with a sulfamethazine/trimethoprim combination in piglets from an intensive pig farm. Thirty-one litters were included in study. Eight litters were treated once with toltrazuril (20 mg/kg b.w.) at 3 days of age (Toltra group); 8 litters were treated with 2 ml/animal of a sulphonamide combination (sodium sulfamethazine 250 mg and trimethoprim 50 mg/kg b.w.) for 3 consecutive days starting at 3 days of age (Sulfa group), and 15 litters were untreated (control group). Counts of oocyst per gram on pooled feces sampled from each litter were carried out on Days 7, 14, 21 and 28 and diarrhea was registered daily from pooled samples. Piglets were weighed on Days 1, 7 and 28 and mean weight gain (WG) and daily weight gain (DWG) were evaluated. The economic profit of treatment was evaluated comparing the WG of piglets of each treatment group from the day of birth to Day 28. On Days 14, 21 and 28, toltrazuril showed a better efficacy in controlling fecal oocyst output, diarrhea and weight gain compared with sulphamidic treatment (P<0.001). The budgeting analysis showed a return of economic benefit of (sic) 0.915 per toltrazuril-treated piglets and an additional cost of (sic) 1.155 per sulphonamide-treated piglets.

Corrigendum to "Toltrazuril and sulphonamide treatment against naturally Isospora suis infected suckling piglets: Is there an actual profit?" [Vet. Parasitol. 164 (2009) 362-365] (DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.04.028) / Scala, A.; Demontis, F.; Varcasia, A.; Pipia, A. P.; Poglayen, G.; Ferrari, N.; Genchi, M.. - In: VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY. - ISSN 0304-4017. - 166:1-2(2009), pp. 182-182. [10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.008]

Corrigendum to "Toltrazuril and sulphonamide treatment against naturally Isospora suis infected suckling piglets: Is there an actual profit?" [Vet. Parasitol. 164 (2009) 362-365] (DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.04.028)

Scala A.;Demontis F.;Varcasia A.;Poglayen G.;Genchi M.
2009-01-01

Abstract

A study was carried out to assess the efficacy and the economic profit of prophylactic treatment against Isopsora suis with toltrazuril or with a sulfamethazine/trimethoprim combination in piglets from an intensive pig farm. Thirty-one litters were included in study. Eight litters were treated once with toltrazuril (20 mg/kg b.w.) at 3 days of age (Toltra group); 8 litters were treated with 2 ml/animal of a sulphonamide combination (sodium sulfamethazine 250 mg and trimethoprim 50 mg/kg b.w.) for 3 consecutive days starting at 3 days of age (Sulfa group), and 15 litters were untreated (control group). Counts of oocyst per gram on pooled feces sampled from each litter were carried out on Days 7, 14, 21 and 28 and diarrhea was registered daily from pooled samples. Piglets were weighed on Days 1, 7 and 28 and mean weight gain (WG) and daily weight gain (DWG) were evaluated. The economic profit of treatment was evaluated comparing the WG of piglets of each treatment group from the day of birth to Day 28. On Days 14, 21 and 28, toltrazuril showed a better efficacy in controlling fecal oocyst output, diarrhea and weight gain compared with sulphamidic treatment (P<0.001). The budgeting analysis showed a return of economic benefit of (sic) 0.915 per toltrazuril-treated piglets and an additional cost of (sic) 1.155 per sulphonamide-treated piglets.
2009
Corrigendum to "Toltrazuril and sulphonamide treatment against naturally Isospora suis infected suckling piglets: Is there an actual profit?" [Vet. Parasitol. 164 (2009) 362-365] (DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.04.028) / Scala, A.; Demontis, F.; Varcasia, A.; Pipia, A. P.; Poglayen, G.; Ferrari, N.; Genchi, M.. - In: VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY. - ISSN 0304-4017. - 166:1-2(2009), pp. 182-182. [10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.008]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/256445
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact