In the framework of geosite management, specific targeted symbols for geomorphological legends are still lacking. Concerning geosites of geomorphological interest, geomorphological mapping requires targeted symbols in relation to goals and applications, either concerning geomorphic hazards and risk detection or the enhancement of resources, in particular those related to cultural heritage and, hence, geoheritage. A new methodology for mapping geo(morpho)heritage on geomorphological maps is presented in this paper. Nine iconic examples from the Italian landscape, selected in different morphogenetic and morphoclimatic contexts, are proposed to test the methodology in relation to point, polyline and polygon features. Moreover, guidelines for mapping are suggested according to the importance of the site and to the complexity of processes characterizing each case study.

Advances in Geoheritage Mapping: Application to Iconic Geomorphological Examples from the Italian Landscape / Coratza, Paola; Maria Bollati, Irene; Panizza, Valeria; Brandolini, Pierluigi; Castaldini, Doriano; Cucchi, Franco; Deiana, Giacomo; Del Monte, Maurizio; Faccini, Francesco; Finocchiaro, Furio; Gioia, Dario; Melis, Rita; Minopoli, Carmine; Nesci, Olivia; Paliaga, Guido; Pennetta, Micla; Perotti, Luigi; Pica, Alessia; Tognetto, Federico; Trocciola, Alfredo; Valentini, Laura; Giardino, Marco; Pelfini, Manuela. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 13(20), 11538:(2021). [10.3390/su132011538]

Advances in Geoheritage Mapping: Application to Iconic Geomorphological Examples from the Italian Landscape

Valeria Panizza
;
2021-01-01

Abstract

In the framework of geosite management, specific targeted symbols for geomorphological legends are still lacking. Concerning geosites of geomorphological interest, geomorphological mapping requires targeted symbols in relation to goals and applications, either concerning geomorphic hazards and risk detection or the enhancement of resources, in particular those related to cultural heritage and, hence, geoheritage. A new methodology for mapping geo(morpho)heritage on geomorphological maps is presented in this paper. Nine iconic examples from the Italian landscape, selected in different morphogenetic and morphoclimatic contexts, are proposed to test the methodology in relation to point, polyline and polygon features. Moreover, guidelines for mapping are suggested according to the importance of the site and to the complexity of processes characterizing each case study.
2021
Inglese
13(20), 11538
Esperti anonimi
geoheritage, geosite mapping, geomorphological maps, Italian physical landscape
Internazionale
No
Coratza, Paola; Maria Bollati, Irene; Panizza, Valeria; Brandolini, Pierluigi; Castaldini, Doriano; Cucchi, Franco; Deiana, Giacomo; Del Monte, Mauriz...espandi
Advances in Geoheritage Mapping: Application to Iconic Geomorphological Examples from the Italian Landscape / Coratza, Paola; Maria Bollati, Irene; Panizza, Valeria; Brandolini, Pierluigi; Castaldini, Doriano; Cucchi, Franco; Deiana, Giacomo; Del Monte, Maurizio; Faccini, Francesco; Finocchiaro, Furio; Gioia, Dario; Melis, Rita; Minopoli, Carmine; Nesci, Olivia; Paliaga, Guido; Pennetta, Micla; Perotti, Luigi; Pica, Alessia; Tognetto, Federico; Trocciola, Alfredo; Valentini, Laura; Giardino, Marco; Pelfini, Manuela. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 13(20), 11538:(2021). [10.3390/su132011538]
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
262
23
open
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
sustainability-13-11538_compressed.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione finale pubblicata)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.46 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/253139
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 58
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 47
social impact