Objectives/Hypothesis Squamous cell carcinoma arising from the nasal vestibule is a rare condition accounting for about 1% of head and neck malignancies with several peculiarities concerning both staging and treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological and functional results of two different treatment modalities for the primary site: surgery and brachytherapy. Study Design A case series with the comparison of two different treatment modalities. Methods We evaluate clinical and survival data of 12 untreated patients, enrolled by a multidisciplinary tumor board, comparing oncological, functional, and esthetic results after surgery or after interstitial brachytherapy as exclusive treatments for the primary site. The functional and esthetic outcome was subjectively rated by the patients using a five-point scale. Results Locoregional control and survival are not significantly different between patients primarily treated by surgery and by brachytherapy. The functional and esthetic outcome, as assessed by the degree of satisfaction of the patients, is significantly better after primary brachytherapy than after primary surgery (P =.014). Conclusions In our experience brachytherapy, accomplished in close cooperation between surgeons and radiation oncologists, achieves oncological results that are not different from surgery, but with a higher degree of patient satisfaction, mainly due to the esthetic outcome. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 126:367-371, 2016.

Comparison of interstitial brachytherapy and surgery as primary treatments for nasal vestibule carcinomas / Bussu, F.; Tagliaferri, L.; Mattiucci, G.; Parrilla, C.; Dinapoli, N.; Micciche, F.; Artuso, A.; Galli, J.; Almadori, G.; Valentini, V.; Paludetti, G.. - In: LARYNGOSCOPE. - ISSN 0023-852X. - 126:2(2016), pp. 367-371. [10.1002/lary.25498]

Comparison of interstitial brachytherapy and surgery as primary treatments for nasal vestibule carcinomas

Bussu F.;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis Squamous cell carcinoma arising from the nasal vestibule is a rare condition accounting for about 1% of head and neck malignancies with several peculiarities concerning both staging and treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological and functional results of two different treatment modalities for the primary site: surgery and brachytherapy. Study Design A case series with the comparison of two different treatment modalities. Methods We evaluate clinical and survival data of 12 untreated patients, enrolled by a multidisciplinary tumor board, comparing oncological, functional, and esthetic results after surgery or after interstitial brachytherapy as exclusive treatments for the primary site. The functional and esthetic outcome was subjectively rated by the patients using a five-point scale. Results Locoregional control and survival are not significantly different between patients primarily treated by surgery and by brachytherapy. The functional and esthetic outcome, as assessed by the degree of satisfaction of the patients, is significantly better after primary brachytherapy than after primary surgery (P =.014). Conclusions In our experience brachytherapy, accomplished in close cooperation between surgeons and radiation oncologists, achieves oncological results that are not different from surgery, but with a higher degree of patient satisfaction, mainly due to the esthetic outcome. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 126:367-371, 2016.
2016
Inglese
126
2
367
371
5
brachytherapy; columella carcinoma; Nasal vestibule carcinoma; nose reconstruction; total rhinectomy; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brachytherapy; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Cavity; Nose Neoplasms; Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures; Radiotherapy Dosage; Treatment Outcome
No
Bussu, F.; Tagliaferri, L.; Mattiucci, G.; Parrilla, C.; Dinapoli, N.; Micciche, F.; Artuso, A.; Galli, J.; Almadori, G.; Valentini, V.; Paludetti, G....espandi
Comparison of interstitial brachytherapy and surgery as primary treatments for nasal vestibule carcinomas / Bussu, F.; Tagliaferri, L.; Mattiucci, G.; Parrilla, C.; Dinapoli, N.; Micciche, F.; Artuso, A.; Galli, J.; Almadori, G.; Valentini, V.; Paludetti, G.. - In: LARYNGOSCOPE. - ISSN 0023-852X. - 126:2(2016), pp. 367-371. [10.1002/lary.25498]
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
262
11
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/245985
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 66
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact