The primary functional issues following conservative therapy for advanced laryngeal cancer concern swallowing. Here, we evaluated the recovery of swallowing after supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCL) in patients with primary or recurrent laryngeal cancer. We evaluated the swallowing recovery in 27 SCL patients through oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy, and we evaluated their quality of life using EORTC questionnaires. Four patients underwent total laryngectomy during follow-up. Patients who retained their larynges were able to feed without nutritional support and without tracheostoma. The only significantly different parameter between the primary and salvage cases was the time elapsed to the removal of nasogastric/PEG tubes, which was longer in salvage cases. SCL has been demonstrated as a valuable option for primary and recurrent laryngeal cancer patients. The present data demonstrate good functional results, particularly in terms of swallowing after previous treatments and in primary settings. The combination of oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy and questionnaires appears to be an adequate, standardizable approach to assessing swallowing function after SCL.

Evaluation of swallowing function after supracricoid laryngectomy as a primary or salvage procedure / Bussu, F., Galli, J., Valenza, V., D'Alatri, L., Pizzuto, D.A., Almadori, G., Giordano, A., Paludetti, G.. - In: DYSPHAGIA. - ISSN 0179-051X. - 30:6(2015), pp. 686-694. [10.1007/s00455-015-9645-y]

Evaluation of swallowing function after supracricoid laryngectomy as a primary or salvage procedure

Bussu F.;
2015-01-01

Abstract

The primary functional issues following conservative therapy for advanced laryngeal cancer concern swallowing. Here, we evaluated the recovery of swallowing after supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCL) in patients with primary or recurrent laryngeal cancer. We evaluated the swallowing recovery in 27 SCL patients through oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy, and we evaluated their quality of life using EORTC questionnaires. Four patients underwent total laryngectomy during follow-up. Patients who retained their larynges were able to feed without nutritional support and without tracheostoma. The only significantly different parameter between the primary and salvage cases was the time elapsed to the removal of nasogastric/PEG tubes, which was longer in salvage cases. SCL has been demonstrated as a valuable option for primary and recurrent laryngeal cancer patients. The present data demonstrate good functional results, particularly in terms of swallowing after previous treatments and in primary settings. The combination of oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy and questionnaires appears to be an adequate, standardizable approach to assessing swallowing function after SCL.
2015
Inglese
30
6
686
694
9
Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; EORTC QLQ; Laryngeal SCC; Organ preservation; Salvage surgery; Supracricoid surgery; Swallowing scintigraphy; Aged; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cricoid Cartilage; Deglutition; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Laryngeal Neoplasms; Laryngectomy; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Period; Retrospective Studies; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Quality of Life
No
Bussu, F.; Galli, J.; Valenza, V.; D'Alatri, L.; Pizzuto, D. A.; Almadori, G.; Giordano, A.; Paludetti, G.
Evaluation of swallowing function after supracricoid laryngectomy as a primary or salvage procedure / Bussu, F., Galli, J., Valenza, V., D'Alatri, L., Pizzuto, D.A., Almadori, G., Giordano, A., Paludetti, G.. - In: DYSPHAGIA. - ISSN 0179-051X. - 30:6(2015), pp. 686-694. [10.1007/s00455-015-9645-y]
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
262
8
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/245959
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact