Background. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic arches can be very challenging. Purpose. )e aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to report the two-year preliminary data on clinical and radiographic performance of implantsupported overdentures with a metal bar and low-profile attachments. Material and Methods. A computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) titanium bar or a conventional cast metal bar was fabricated according to the anatomy of the ridge, prosthetic contours (teeth setup), and implant position. )ree to six threadable OT Equator attachments (Rhein 83, Bologna, Italy) were placed along the implant bar. A cobalt-chromium alloy metal framework was fabricated and fitted onto the metal bar as a counterpart. Prosthetic survival rate, biologic and technical complications, peri-implant bone loss, changes in oral health impact profile index, bleeding on probing, and plaque index were reported. Results. Overall, 177 implants were placed (range three to six) to support 43 metal bars with 170 OT Equators (Rhein 83, range three to six). Eleven metal bars were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology, while the other 32 were conventionally produced using cast technique. All the participants were followed up for at least two years (mean 42.2 months, range 24-88 months) after prosthesis delivery. Two maxillary implants failed in one nonsmoking patient (1.1%). )e 2-year prosthesis survival rate was 97.7%. Only three minor technical complications were reported. Two years after loading, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.22 ± 0.09mm(95% CI: 0.16 to 0.26). Two years after loading, OHIP was 22.3 ± 7.1 (95% CI from 17.4 to 24.6). Compared to the baseline, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). At the two-year follow-up session, successful periodontal parameters were experienced. Conclusions. Implant overdenture supported by a CAD/CAM titanium bar may be a reliable option for the treatment of the edentulous arch over a 2-year period. Oral health-related quality of life significantly improved in all treated participants.

Two years after loading performance of implant-supported overdenture with metal bar and low-profile attachments: A prospective case series multicenter clinical study / Montanari, M.; Tallarico, M.; Vaccaro, G.; Ferrari, E.; Scrascia, R.; Ortensi, L.; Cicciu, M.; Meloni, S. M.; Lumbau, A. I.; Avrampou, M.; Martinolli, M.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY. - ISSN 1687-8728. - 2020:(2020), pp. 1-8. [10.1155/2020/8830722]

Two years after loading performance of implant-supported overdenture with metal bar and low-profile attachments: A prospective case series multicenter clinical study

Montanari M.;Tallarico M.;Meloni S. M.
;
Lumbau A. I.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Background. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic arches can be very challenging. Purpose. )e aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to report the two-year preliminary data on clinical and radiographic performance of implantsupported overdentures with a metal bar and low-profile attachments. Material and Methods. A computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) titanium bar or a conventional cast metal bar was fabricated according to the anatomy of the ridge, prosthetic contours (teeth setup), and implant position. )ree to six threadable OT Equator attachments (Rhein 83, Bologna, Italy) were placed along the implant bar. A cobalt-chromium alloy metal framework was fabricated and fitted onto the metal bar as a counterpart. Prosthetic survival rate, biologic and technical complications, peri-implant bone loss, changes in oral health impact profile index, bleeding on probing, and plaque index were reported. Results. Overall, 177 implants were placed (range three to six) to support 43 metal bars with 170 OT Equators (Rhein 83, range three to six). Eleven metal bars were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology, while the other 32 were conventionally produced using cast technique. All the participants were followed up for at least two years (mean 42.2 months, range 24-88 months) after prosthesis delivery. Two maxillary implants failed in one nonsmoking patient (1.1%). )e 2-year prosthesis survival rate was 97.7%. Only three minor technical complications were reported. Two years after loading, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.22 ± 0.09mm(95% CI: 0.16 to 0.26). Two years after loading, OHIP was 22.3 ± 7.1 (95% CI from 17.4 to 24.6). Compared to the baseline, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). At the two-year follow-up session, successful periodontal parameters were experienced. Conclusions. Implant overdenture supported by a CAD/CAM titanium bar may be a reliable option for the treatment of the edentulous arch over a 2-year period. Oral health-related quality of life significantly improved in all treated participants.
2020
Two years after loading performance of implant-supported overdenture with metal bar and low-profile attachments: A prospective case series multicenter clinical study / Montanari, M.; Tallarico, M.; Vaccaro, G.; Ferrari, E.; Scrascia, R.; Ortensi, L.; Cicciu, M.; Meloni, S. M.; Lumbau, A. I.; Avrampou, M.; Martinolli, M.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY. - ISSN 1687-8728. - 2020:(2020), pp. 1-8. [10.1155/2020/8830722]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/243267
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact