Treatment guidelines (GL) in psychiatry represent a useful and functional tool to be explored and enhanced in terms of the con- tribution of patient care and the promotion of scientific improvement. However, they show some limitations, both clinical and forensic. The objective of this paper is to examine the objectives, the clinical limitations and the applicability of the GL on professional liability (forensic aspects). From a clinical point of view, the GL have objectives that are functional to the promotion of physical and mental health, among which the constitutional observance of the right to health, the improvement of public health, the implementation of best clinical practices, the promotion of scientific research, the professional training of operators in the field of physical and mental health. However, GL cannot replace a contextualized clinical judgment. GL must be applied, in the single clinical case, in light of their multiple criticalities, including the limits of the methodology used for their formulation, the differences between the GL’ recommendations, the difficulty of their application in daily clinical practice, the lack of specific treatment interventions. From a forensic psychiatric point of view, GL, as currently conceived, can- not be used in terms of professional liability without their interpretation on a legal basis with forensic psychiatric methodology, similarly to any other clinical and scientific information, with its qualifications and criticalities.
Guidelines in psychiatry: clinical and forensic issues / Nivoli, ALESSANDRA M. A.; Milia, Paolo; Depalmas, Cristiano; Nivoli, Giancarlo; Biondi, Massimo; Lorettu, Liliana; SOCIETÀ ITALIANA DI PSICHIATRIA FORENSE, SOCIETÀ ITALIANA DI PSICHIATRIA. - In: RIVISTA DI PSICHIATRIA. - ISSN 2038-2502. - 55:6 -supplemento(2020), pp. 40-46.
Guidelines in psychiatry: clinical and forensic issues
PAOLO MILIAMembro del Collaboration Group
;CRISTIANO DEPALMASMembro del Collaboration Group
;GIANCARLO NIVOLIConceptualization
;LILIANA LORETTU
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2020-01-01
Abstract
Treatment guidelines (GL) in psychiatry represent a useful and functional tool to be explored and enhanced in terms of the con- tribution of patient care and the promotion of scientific improvement. However, they show some limitations, both clinical and forensic. The objective of this paper is to examine the objectives, the clinical limitations and the applicability of the GL on professional liability (forensic aspects). From a clinical point of view, the GL have objectives that are functional to the promotion of physical and mental health, among which the constitutional observance of the right to health, the improvement of public health, the implementation of best clinical practices, the promotion of scientific research, the professional training of operators in the field of physical and mental health. However, GL cannot replace a contextualized clinical judgment. GL must be applied, in the single clinical case, in light of their multiple criticalities, including the limits of the methodology used for their formulation, the differences between the GL’ recommendations, the difficulty of their application in daily clinical practice, the lack of specific treatment interventions. From a forensic psychiatric point of view, GL, as currently conceived, can- not be used in terms of professional liability without their interpretation on a legal basis with forensic psychiatric methodology, similarly to any other clinical and scientific information, with its qualifications and criticalities.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.