By retracing the phases of Severino’s philosophical formation and examining the development of his thought – from the initial adhesion to Bontadini’s view about Problematicism up to La struttura originaria and Ritornare a Parmenide –, the essay aims at showing how the thesis of the eternity of everything depends on a sort of “reversal” of the relationship between “abstract” and “concrete” outlined by Giovanni Gentile in his Sistema di logica.
Attualismo e neoparmenidismo / Visentin, Mauro. - In: LA FILOSOFIA FUTURA. - ISSN 2282-4022. - VII:2(2020), pp. 151-160.
Attualismo e neoparmenidismo
Mauro Visentin
2020-01-01
Abstract
By retracing the phases of Severino’s philosophical formation and examining the development of his thought – from the initial adhesion to Bontadini’s view about Problematicism up to La struttura originaria and Ritornare a Parmenide –, the essay aims at showing how the thesis of the eternity of everything depends on a sort of “reversal” of the relationship between “abstract” and “concrete” outlined by Giovanni Gentile in his Sistema di logica.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
