Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of ultrasoundguided intra-articular injections of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) for symptomatic early osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. Methods A prospective controlled double-blinded randomized trial on 80 patients with hip OA was conducted. The patients were divided in two groups of 40 patients each: group 1 underwent three PRP intra-articular ultrasound-guided injections, whereas group 2 underwent three HA injections. WOMAC, VAS, and Harris Hip Score were evaluated for both groups before and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. Results The two groups were comparable in age, sex, body mass index, and severity of hip OA. Both groups showed a significant improvement from baseline at 6-month and 12-month follow-ups for all the outcome measures. No major complications were observed during the treatment and at follow-ups in both the groups. Conclusion PRP did not offer significantly better results comparedwith HA in patients with moderate signs of OA, and thus it should not be considered as first-line treatment. Level of Evidence Level II, randomized controlled trial.

Treatment of early hip osteoarthritis: Ultrasound-guided platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid injections in a randomized clinical trial / Doria, Carlo; Mosele, Giulia Raffaella; Caggiari, Gianfilippo; Puddu, Leonardo; Ciurlia, Emanuele. - In: JOINTS. - ISSN 2282-4324. - 5:3(2017), pp. 152-155. [10.1055/s-0037-1605584]

Treatment of early hip osteoarthritis: Ultrasound-guided platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid injections in a randomized clinical trial

Doria, Carlo;Mosele, Giulia Raffaella;Caggiari, Gianfilippo;Puddu, Leonardo;Ciurlia, Emanuele
2017-01-01

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of ultrasoundguided intra-articular injections of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) for symptomatic early osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. Methods A prospective controlled double-blinded randomized trial on 80 patients with hip OA was conducted. The patients were divided in two groups of 40 patients each: group 1 underwent three PRP intra-articular ultrasound-guided injections, whereas group 2 underwent three HA injections. WOMAC, VAS, and Harris Hip Score were evaluated for both groups before and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. Results The two groups were comparable in age, sex, body mass index, and severity of hip OA. Both groups showed a significant improvement from baseline at 6-month and 12-month follow-ups for all the outcome measures. No major complications were observed during the treatment and at follow-ups in both the groups. Conclusion PRP did not offer significantly better results comparedwith HA in patients with moderate signs of OA, and thus it should not be considered as first-line treatment. Level of Evidence Level II, randomized controlled trial.
2017
Treatment of early hip osteoarthritis: Ultrasound-guided platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid injections in a randomized clinical trial / Doria, Carlo; Mosele, Giulia Raffaella; Caggiari, Gianfilippo; Puddu, Leonardo; Ciurlia, Emanuele. - In: JOINTS. - ISSN 2282-4324. - 5:3(2017), pp. 152-155. [10.1055/s-0037-1605584]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2017 Treatment of early hip osteoarthritis ultrasoun-guided platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid injections in a randomized clinical trialc.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione finale pubblicata)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 117.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
117.83 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/200045
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact