In order to understand the freezability of epididymal sperm and its fertilising potential we compared the membrane integrity and the capacity to bind to the zona pellucida of frozen/thawed epididymal and ejaculated sperm. Epididymal semen (EpS) was harvested by flushing the epididymal tails of the testis obtained by standing castrations of 3-year old colts while ejaculated semen (EjS) was collected by artificial vagina. Semen was cryopreserved with the pellet method. Sperm viability and acrosome integrity were evaluated after thawing by incubating spermatozoa with propidium iodide and FITCPSA. Fertilising potential was assessed by glycerol-Hoechst staining of IVM horse and ovine oocytes coincubated with spermatozoa for 24 h. After thawing both EpS and EjS presented 50% viability, but a significant difference (Chi-Square test) was evidenced in the percentage of live acrosome reacted spermatozoa (EpS: 6%; EjS: 36.1%; p < 0:001). Zona binding test both with horse (EpS: 0.50.5; EjS: 0.30.5; p¼0.285) and ovine (EpS: 57.5; EjS: 3.65.6; p¼0.246) oocytes did not revealed any significant difference (ANOVA) between EpS and EjS. The results suggest that epididymal stallion spermatozoa can be cryopreserved successfully with a better membrane integrity and an equal capacity to bind to the zona pellucida in vitro compared to ejaculated spermatozoa.

Comparison between ejaculated and epididymal stallion sperm cryopreserved with the pellet method / Rosati, Irma; Berlinguer, F; Ledda, Sergio; Bogliolo, Luisa; Cherchi, R; Leoni, Giovanni Giuseppe; Naitana, S.. - In: REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS. - ISSN 0936-6768. - 37:(2002), pp. 250-250. (Intervento presentato al convegno 6th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Domestic Animal Reproduction (ESDAR) tenutosi a Parma nel 12-14 settembre 2002).

Comparison between ejaculated and epididymal stallion sperm cryopreserved with the pellet method

ROSATI, Irma;Berlinguer F;LEDDA, Sergio;BOGLIOLO, Luisa;LEONI, Giovanni Giuseppe;
2002-01-01

Abstract

In order to understand the freezability of epididymal sperm and its fertilising potential we compared the membrane integrity and the capacity to bind to the zona pellucida of frozen/thawed epididymal and ejaculated sperm. Epididymal semen (EpS) was harvested by flushing the epididymal tails of the testis obtained by standing castrations of 3-year old colts while ejaculated semen (EjS) was collected by artificial vagina. Semen was cryopreserved with the pellet method. Sperm viability and acrosome integrity were evaluated after thawing by incubating spermatozoa with propidium iodide and FITCPSA. Fertilising potential was assessed by glycerol-Hoechst staining of IVM horse and ovine oocytes coincubated with spermatozoa for 24 h. After thawing both EpS and EjS presented 50% viability, but a significant difference (Chi-Square test) was evidenced in the percentage of live acrosome reacted spermatozoa (EpS: 6%; EjS: 36.1%; p < 0:001). Zona binding test both with horse (EpS: 0.50.5; EjS: 0.30.5; p¼0.285) and ovine (EpS: 57.5; EjS: 3.65.6; p¼0.246) oocytes did not revealed any significant difference (ANOVA) between EpS and EjS. The results suggest that epididymal stallion spermatozoa can be cryopreserved successfully with a better membrane integrity and an equal capacity to bind to the zona pellucida in vitro compared to ejaculated spermatozoa.
2002
Comparison between ejaculated and epididymal stallion sperm cryopreserved with the pellet method / Rosati, Irma; Berlinguer, F; Ledda, Sergio; Bogliolo, Luisa; Cherchi, R; Leoni, Giovanni Giuseppe; Naitana, S.. - In: REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS. - ISSN 0936-6768. - 37:(2002), pp. 250-250. (Intervento presentato al convegno 6th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Domestic Animal Reproduction (ESDAR) tenutosi a Parma nel 12-14 settembre 2002).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/54927
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact