The aim of this study was to compare the quality traits ofSparus aurataspecimens from 2 different farming activities (intensively-reared in sea cages and extensively-reared in a coastal lagoon) and from the wild in Sardinia (Italy). Yields and biological indexes of the fish and biochemical and nutritional factors of their muscle were evaluated to verify putative differences due to their origin and/or the farming technique employed. Two different statistical approaches were applied to find out possible dissimilarities among the 3 groups: 1) univariate analysis and subsequent post-hoc comparison tests were employed to test specific hypotheses on each variable’s role; 2) multivariate analyses were used to assess which variables mainly contributed to differentiate the 3 groups. The results obtained showed that yields and biological indexes were higher in extensively-reared seabreams. Proximate composition revealed differences in term of lipid and moisture content: the former was superior in intensively-cultured fish, while the second was higher in those from wild stock. Protein and ashes did not show significant differences among the 3 groups studied. As regards mineral content, significant differences were detected probably as a consequence of different diets of the 3 groups. Finally, fatty acids profiles revealed that n-3 PUFAs were higher in wild seabreams, n-6 PUFAs were superior in the intensively-reared ones, while extensivelyreared fish showed the highest n3/n6 ratio.

Chemical composition of the muscle of wild, extensively and intensively-reared gilthead seabream (Sparus aurataLinnaeus, 1758) from Sardinia(2011 Feb 15).

Chemical composition of the muscle of wild, extensively and intensively-reared gilthead seabream (Sparus aurataLinnaeus, 1758) from Sardinia

-
2011-02-15

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the quality traits ofSparus aurataspecimens from 2 different farming activities (intensively-reared in sea cages and extensively-reared in a coastal lagoon) and from the wild in Sardinia (Italy). Yields and biological indexes of the fish and biochemical and nutritional factors of their muscle were evaluated to verify putative differences due to their origin and/or the farming technique employed. Two different statistical approaches were applied to find out possible dissimilarities among the 3 groups: 1) univariate analysis and subsequent post-hoc comparison tests were employed to test specific hypotheses on each variable’s role; 2) multivariate analyses were used to assess which variables mainly contributed to differentiate the 3 groups. The results obtained showed that yields and biological indexes were higher in extensively-reared seabreams. Proximate composition revealed differences in term of lipid and moisture content: the former was superior in intensively-cultured fish, while the second was higher in those from wild stock. Protein and ashes did not show significant differences among the 3 groups studied. As regards mineral content, significant differences were detected probably as a consequence of different diets of the 3 groups. Finally, fatty acids profiles revealed that n-3 PUFAs were higher in wild seabreams, n-6 PUFAs were superior in the intensively-reared ones, while extensivelyreared fish showed the highest n3/n6 ratio.
15-feb-2011
Aquaculture; gilthead seabream; quality traits; Sparus aurata; Sardinia
Meloni, Gianni
Chemical composition of the muscle of wild, extensively and intensively-reared gilthead seabream (Sparus aurataLinnaeus, 1758) from Sardinia(2011 Feb 15).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Meloni_G_Chemical_composition_of_the.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 7.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.66 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/251131
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact