Due to its numerous meanings, the term landscape cannot be reduced to a definition that lays claim to conceptual unity. But the title of this book comes to our aid in that it enables us to limit the field of possible definitions to the sphere of relations existing between the landscape project and the city project. When we state the two terms city and landscape separately, we are implicitly acknowledging a detachment between two figures that tradition has considered inseparable, as if reality were inseparable from the representation of reality. But the city is difficult to represent, while the landscape becomes an “additional figure” that takes on the role of revealing the city in situations where it is possible to “see it”. What, then, is the landscape for modernists? What is meant by designing the landscape today? These questions match up with two conceptual worlds: one is the “environmental image”, the “cover” for the unavoidable dynamics of the metropolis, the other in some ways the “counterspace” of the metropolis, the space available for the project, the space that still enables us to design the city. The first contains the classic concept of landscape that we have inherited from tradition, which underlies a representational conception of the landscape as “environmental image”, having impressed on it the acknowledgement of the separability of contemplation of the landscape from living in it, a notion of landscape-object constructed and made an institution by modernity, a type of landscape with which a relationship of equality is never established. The second conception takes the landscape as an eminently projectual figure. It is a concept of landscape as a subject, which sets itself up as collective intelligence of the territory. A concept that implies a “willingness for the project”, as a propensity to take on new meanings in the city territory, different from the conventional ones. This role can only be carried out by projectual intention that will reconstruct the link between city and landscape and this is why we combine the landscape project with the city project.

Urban Landscape Perspectives / Maciocco, Giovanni. - 1:(2008), pp. 1-25.

Urban Landscape Perspectives

MACIOCCO, Giovanni
2008-01-01

Abstract

Due to its numerous meanings, the term landscape cannot be reduced to a definition that lays claim to conceptual unity. But the title of this book comes to our aid in that it enables us to limit the field of possible definitions to the sphere of relations existing between the landscape project and the city project. When we state the two terms city and landscape separately, we are implicitly acknowledging a detachment between two figures that tradition has considered inseparable, as if reality were inseparable from the representation of reality. But the city is difficult to represent, while the landscape becomes an “additional figure” that takes on the role of revealing the city in situations where it is possible to “see it”. What, then, is the landscape for modernists? What is meant by designing the landscape today? These questions match up with two conceptual worlds: one is the “environmental image”, the “cover” for the unavoidable dynamics of the metropolis, the other in some ways the “counterspace” of the metropolis, the space available for the project, the space that still enables us to design the city. The first contains the classic concept of landscape that we have inherited from tradition, which underlies a representational conception of the landscape as “environmental image”, having impressed on it the acknowledgement of the separability of contemplation of the landscape from living in it, a notion of landscape-object constructed and made an institution by modernity, a type of landscape with which a relationship of equality is never established. The second conception takes the landscape as an eminently projectual figure. It is a concept of landscape as a subject, which sets itself up as collective intelligence of the territory. A concept that implies a “willingness for the project”, as a propensity to take on new meanings in the city territory, different from the conventional ones. This role can only be carried out by projectual intention that will reconstruct the link between city and landscape and this is why we combine the landscape project with the city project.
2008
978-3-540-76798-5
Urban Landscape Perspectives / Maciocco, Giovanni. - 1:(2008), pp. 1-25.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/138190
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact