Objectives: To evaluate the capacity of seven self-etchingadhesives (SEAs) to demineralize ground enamel in comparison with traditional phosphoric acid etchant (PAE) using SEM and statistical analysis. Materials and methods: 80 caries-free extracted human third molars were divided into 8 groups (n = 10). Enamel bur-cut surfaces were prepared and, strictly following the manufacturers’ instructions, treated with three priming agents of two-step self-etchingadhesives: Aqua Resulcin Prime (Group 1); Peak™ (Group 2); Clearfil Protect Bond (Group 3); four one-step self-etch (all-in-one) adhesives, G-Bond (Group 4); Artegral One (Group 5); Clearfil S3 Bond (Group 6); Adper Easy Bond (Group 7); and phosphoric acid etching (Control group). The etch patterns for the SEA systems were determined by rinsing off the material with water, acetone and alcohol. A minimum of 15 specimens was used for each group. Morphology matches were made between each SEA system and PAE by means of ultrastructural SEM analysis and were computed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P < 0.05). Results: SEM images showed that two-step-self-etchingadhesives (Groups 1–3) produced a regular pattern over a considerable surface area and depth, not concerning, however, the prismless layer of enamel in the fissure space; one-step self-etch adhesives (Groups 4–7) demonstrated similar morphological features; an uneven demineralization pattern was observed in the PAE group with un-etched prismless enamel in the depth of the fissures. The Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrated no statistically significant difference among the groups (P = 0.43). Conclusions: Despite the enameletchingpattern being similar for all SEAs used, two-step self-etching systems containing phosphate derivative monomers were the most efficient self-etching agents with a more homogeneous and regular pattern of demineralization when compared to the traditional PAE.

Evaluation of the enamel etching pattern of self-etching adhesives / Castelli, G; Gallottini, L; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Lumbau, Aurea Maria Immacolata; Gallina, G; Milia, Egle Patrizia. - 26:Supplement 1 ISSN 0109-5641(2010), pp. e4-e5. (Intervento presentato al convegno Academy of Dental Materials Annual Meeting tenutosi a Trieste nel 7–9 Ottobre) [doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.016].

Evaluation of the enamel etching pattern of self-etching adhesives

SOTGIU, Giovanni;LUMBAU, Aurea Maria Immacolata;MILIA, Egle Patrizia
2010-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the capacity of seven self-etchingadhesives (SEAs) to demineralize ground enamel in comparison with traditional phosphoric acid etchant (PAE) using SEM and statistical analysis. Materials and methods: 80 caries-free extracted human third molars were divided into 8 groups (n = 10). Enamel bur-cut surfaces were prepared and, strictly following the manufacturers’ instructions, treated with three priming agents of two-step self-etchingadhesives: Aqua Resulcin Prime (Group 1); Peak™ (Group 2); Clearfil Protect Bond (Group 3); four one-step self-etch (all-in-one) adhesives, G-Bond (Group 4); Artegral One (Group 5); Clearfil S3 Bond (Group 6); Adper Easy Bond (Group 7); and phosphoric acid etching (Control group). The etch patterns for the SEA systems were determined by rinsing off the material with water, acetone and alcohol. A minimum of 15 specimens was used for each group. Morphology matches were made between each SEA system and PAE by means of ultrastructural SEM analysis and were computed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P < 0.05). Results: SEM images showed that two-step-self-etchingadhesives (Groups 1–3) produced a regular pattern over a considerable surface area and depth, not concerning, however, the prismless layer of enamel in the fissure space; one-step self-etch adhesives (Groups 4–7) demonstrated similar morphological features; an uneven demineralization pattern was observed in the PAE group with un-etched prismless enamel in the depth of the fissures. The Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrated no statistically significant difference among the groups (P = 0.43). Conclusions: Despite the enameletchingpattern being similar for all SEAs used, two-step self-etching systems containing phosphate derivative monomers were the most efficient self-etching agents with a more homogeneous and regular pattern of demineralization when compared to the traditional PAE.
2010
Evaluation of the enamel etching pattern of self-etching adhesives / Castelli, G; Gallottini, L; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Lumbau, Aurea Maria Immacolata; Gallina, G; Milia, Egle Patrizia. - 26:Supplement 1 ISSN 0109-5641(2010), pp. e4-e5. (Intervento presentato al convegno Academy of Dental Materials Annual Meeting tenutosi a Trieste nel 7–9 Ottobre) [doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.016].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/70706
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact