Background: Monozygotic twins have long been studied to estimate heritability and explore epigenetic influences on phenotypic variation. The phenotypic and epigenetic similarities of monozygotic twins have been assumed to be largely due to their genetic identity. Results: Here, by analyzing data from a genome-scale study of DNA methylation in monozygotic and dizygotic twins, we identified genomic regions at which the epigenetic similarity of monozygotic twins is substantially greater than can be explained by their genetic identity. This "epigenetic supersimilarity" apparently results from locus-specific establishment of epigenotype prior to embryo cleavage during twinning. Epigenetically supersimilar loci exhibit systemic interindividual epigenetic variation and plasticity to periconceptional environment and are enriched in sub-telomeric regions. In case-control studies nested in a prospective cohort, blood DNA methylation at these loci years before diagnosis is associated with risk of developing several types of cancer. Conclusions: These results establish a link between early embryonic epigenetic development and adult disease. More broadly, epigenetic supersimilarity is a previously unrecognized phenomenon that may contribute to the phenotypic similarity of monozygotic twins.

Epigenetic supersimilarity of monozygotic twin pairs / van Baak, T. E.; Coarfa, C.; Dugue, P. -A.; Fiorito, G.; Laritsky, E.; Baker, M. S.; Kessler, N. J.; Dong, J.; Duryea, J. D.; Silver, M. J.; Saffari, A.; Prentice, A. M.; Moore, S. E.; Ghantous, A.; Routledge, M. N.; Gong, Y. Y.; Herceg, Z.; Vineis, P.; Severi, G.; Hopper, J. L.; Southey, M. C.; Giles, G. G.; Milne, R. L.; Waterland, R. A.. - In: GENOME BIOLOGY. - ISSN 1474-760X. - 19:1(2018), p. 2. [10.1186/s13059-017-1374-0]

Epigenetic supersimilarity of monozygotic twin pairs

Fiorito G.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: Monozygotic twins have long been studied to estimate heritability and explore epigenetic influences on phenotypic variation. The phenotypic and epigenetic similarities of monozygotic twins have been assumed to be largely due to their genetic identity. Results: Here, by analyzing data from a genome-scale study of DNA methylation in monozygotic and dizygotic twins, we identified genomic regions at which the epigenetic similarity of monozygotic twins is substantially greater than can be explained by their genetic identity. This "epigenetic supersimilarity" apparently results from locus-specific establishment of epigenotype prior to embryo cleavage during twinning. Epigenetically supersimilar loci exhibit systemic interindividual epigenetic variation and plasticity to periconceptional environment and are enriched in sub-telomeric regions. In case-control studies nested in a prospective cohort, blood DNA methylation at these loci years before diagnosis is associated with risk of developing several types of cancer. Conclusions: These results establish a link between early embryonic epigenetic development and adult disease. More broadly, epigenetic supersimilarity is a previously unrecognized phenomenon that may contribute to the phenotypic similarity of monozygotic twins.
2018
Epigenetic supersimilarity of monozygotic twin pairs / van Baak, T. E.; Coarfa, C.; Dugue, P. -A.; Fiorito, G.; Laritsky, E.; Baker, M. S.; Kessler, N. J.; Dong, J.; Duryea, J. D.; Silver, M. J.; Saffari, A.; Prentice, A. M.; Moore, S. E.; Ghantous, A.; Routledge, M. N.; Gong, Y. Y.; Herceg, Z.; Vineis, P.; Severi, G.; Hopper, J. L.; Southey, M. C.; Giles, G. G.; Milne, R. L.; Waterland, R. A.. - In: GENOME BIOLOGY. - ISSN 1474-760X. - 19:1(2018), p. 2. [10.1186/s13059-017-1374-0]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s13059-017-1374-0.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione finale pubblicata)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.53 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.53 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/245422
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 72
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact