The paper aims to address the notion of “borderline case” by referring to series instead of classes of legal concepts. While “hard” cases are understood as cases in which the meaning of the rule is controversial, “bordeline cases” are thought of as those cases in which the meaning of the involved legal concepts is controversial. Here, the application of legal notions is not much a matter of subsumption rather than of construction from inside of the criteria for the application itself.

Il caso-limite e le funzioni dei concetti giuridici / Gazzolo, Tommaso. - In: ARS INTERPRETANDI. - ISSN 1722-8352. - 2019:1(2019), pp. 31-47.

Il caso-limite e le funzioni dei concetti giuridici

Tommaso Gazzolo
2019-01-01

Abstract

The paper aims to address the notion of “borderline case” by referring to series instead of classes of legal concepts. While “hard” cases are understood as cases in which the meaning of the rule is controversial, “bordeline cases” are thought of as those cases in which the meaning of the involved legal concepts is controversial. Here, the application of legal notions is not much a matter of subsumption rather than of construction from inside of the criteria for the application itself.
2019
Il caso-limite e le funzioni dei concetti giuridici / Gazzolo, Tommaso. - In: ARS INTERPRETANDI. - ISSN 1722-8352. - 2019:1(2019), pp. 31-47.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11388/223889
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact